This is a really interesting visual style and you've done a good job of applying Dyer to your analysis. You show confidence in your analysis of visual signifiers to create meaning and draw links between the two texts in the promo package. This is L4 work - well done. To improve, why did he start with Hitchcock? Also - check spelling/punctuation throughout and highlight key terms.
This is a really interesting visual style and you've done a good job of applying Dyer to your analysis. You show confidence in your analysis of visual signifiers to create meaning and draw links between the two texts in the promo package. This is L4 work - well done. To improve, why did he start with Hitchcock? Also - check spelling/punctuation throughout and highlight key terms.
This is a really interesting visual style and you've done a good job of applying Dyer to your analysis. You show confidence in your analysis of visual signifiers to create meaning and draw links between the two texts in the promo package. This is L4 work - well done. To improve, why did he start with Hitchcock? Also - check spelling/punctuation throughout and highlight key terms.
ReplyDeleteThis is a really interesting visual style and you've done a good job of applying Dyer to your analysis. You show confidence in your analysis of visual signifiers to create meaning and draw links between the two texts in the promo package. This is L4 work - well done. To improve, why did he start with Hitchcock? Also - check spelling/punctuation throughout and highlight key terms.
ReplyDelete